![]() ![]() He was out and it was too late to object further. Everyone understood that because the next hand started there was no redress for the eliminated player. The guy who had three of a kind was confused however because the rest of the table was adamant that he had lost he stood up from the table and the next hand commenced. Other players then stated that there was a flush but they were not consistent in how it occurred, some saying on the turn, others saying it got there on the river. The first player then stated that there was not three to a suit in the community cards and that a flush was impossible therefore meaning his three of a kind was best. Then seeing this the other player in the hand objected saying he won the hand with a flush. At the same time one guy started raking in the pot having thought he had won. ![]() The dealer then put all cards into the muck and passed the deck to the next player to deal the next hand. However there didnÂ’t appear to be anything there which covered this situation.Īt showdown in a particular hand, the cards were tabled and nothing was explicitly said about the hands and who won. Wanting to know the correct ruling if it in fact came to that, I consulted. IÂ’m a TD in a small league and came across an interesting but perplexing situation the other week which luckily I didnÂ’t have to rule on. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |